Demonstration — Kibble & Co. is a fictional merchant. An independent demonstration by Nino Chavez of a scoping method — not a BigCommerce product, and not a real procurement.

1. Context & Scope of the Ask

1.1 What is being commissioned

Kibble & Co. is commissioning a subscriptions and recurring-billing capability, built directly against its existing BigCommerce storefront's platform APIs — its Orders, Customers, Price Lists, and Payments APIs — rather than adopting a third-party subscription application from the BigCommerce app marketplace.

Kibble & Co. has never offered subscription commerce before. It evaluated the marketplace-app path first, and rejected it for reasons specific to how the business already runs: an install step and a second vendor relationship to manage; a second admin surface that staff would have to reconcile by hand against Kibble's own catalog, orders, and customer records; a subscriber portal that would look and feel bolted onto Kibble's storefront brand rather than native to it; and subscription-specific software pricing stacked on top of what Kibble already pays for BigCommerce.

A capability built directly against BigCommerce's own platform APIs removes each of those costs: no separate application to install, no second vendor relationship, subscription orders and subscriber records that live inside Kibble's existing BigCommerce admin, and a subscriber portal built as part of Kibble's own storefront rather than a third party's.

The scope in this package has already been de-risked through a working reference implementation, built against production BigCommerce APIs and covering the end-to-end subscription lifecycle described in the sections that follow. The reference implementation is not the deliverable, and its runtime architecture is not for reuse — treat it as an executable answer key for the written requirements, useful when a requirement reads ambiguously. See 10-reference-prototype.md.

1.2 Market context

Subscription commerce is now a competitive-parity requirement for pet-supply retailers selling consumable and replenishable goods, not a differentiator. A mature ecosystem of specialist subscription applications, sold across commerce platforms generally, has established the baseline feature set — flexible cadence management, self-service customer portals, dunning and retry logic, subscription-aware promotions — that any capability Kibble ships must match or exceed to be credible with a subscriber base that has already used subscription commerce with other replenishment brands.

Kibble & Co. sells directly against that expectation gap today: pet food, treats, and supplements are exactly the consumable categories where subscribers expect a subscribe-and-save option, and Kibble currently has none. Every reorder happens the way a one-time order happens — a subscriber has to come back and buy again, with no cadence, no reminder, and no discount for committing to one.

Detailed feature-by-feature competitive positioning — capability matched against the bar existing native and third-party alternatives already set — is provided in 04-competitive-benchmark.md. This section establishes only the framing an estimator needs up front: the target is not a novel product category. It is parity-or-better against a bar the market has already set.

1.3 Target segments

The delivered capability must serve four segments of Kibble & Co.'s own customer base, each with distinct subscription needs:

Individual subscriber. A single-pet household ordering one product line — most often food — on a recurring cadence. Expects self-serve setup with minimal configuration overhead, and is the most price-sensitive segment toward any added subscription fee.

Multi-pet household. Kibble's primary near-term target. These subscribers run multiple concurrent subscription plans across several product lines at once — different food per pet, plus a supplement or treat cadence — and expect subscription pricing that is aware of Kibble's existing price-list and customer-group segmentation (a standing Rewards-tier discount, for instance) rather than a flat, catalog-blind subscription price.

Retail and wholesale partners. Kibble's existing B2B channel: independent pet boutiques, groomers, and small clinics that reorder core SKUs on standing recurring terms. These accounts purchase by invoice or purchase order rather than card-present checkout, run longer commitment terms, and require the capability to integrate with BigCommerce's B2B Edition company-account and account-hierarchy model rather than with individual consumer accounts.

High-volume regional accounts. Kibble operates more than one storefront channel — its direct-to-consumer site and a separate wholesale channel on BigCommerce's Multi-Storefront capability — and as subscriber volume grows across both, auditable, replayable billing operations become an operational necessity rather than a convenience.

The capability-by-segment mapping — which capabilities are required at which segment tier — is detailed in 02-capability-catalog.md.

1.4 Personas

Four personas define the requirements in this package and recur throughout the sibling documents.

Merchant Admin — Kibble's merchandising and ops lead

Subscriber — Kibble's end customer

Developer — implementation partner or in-house engineer

Support / Ops — Kibble's customer service and reconciliation team

1.5 Product principles & quality bar

Four principles set the quality bar the delivered solution is measured against, independent of implementation approach:

1.6 Non-goals for the initial release

The following are explicitly out of scope for the initial release, to bound estimation:

1.7 How to use this package

This package is sequenced so an estimator can move from what must be built (this section, and 02–04) to how it must integrate with the platform (05–06) to how the work breaks down and is bid (07–09). The reference prototype (10) is available throughout as an executable specification of intended behavior — not as source code or a runtime architecture to port. The table below maps each sibling file to the question it is written to answer.

File Question it answers
02-capability-catalog.md What capabilities, organized by domain, must the delivered solution provide?
03-user-journeys.md What end-to-end flows must each persona be able to complete?
04-competitive-benchmark.md What functional bar do existing native and third-party alternatives already set?
05-platform-integration-contract.md What platform APIs, webhooks, and data contracts must the solution integrate against?
06-non-functional-requirements.md What performance, security, scalability, and compliance bars apply?
07-work-breakdown.md How does the capability set decompose into estimable units of delivery?
08-scope-boundary-and-engagement-model.md What is explicitly in and out of scope, and how is the engagement structured?
09-estimation-scaffold.md What structure should the vendor's cost and timeline estimate follow?
10-reference-prototype.md What does the existing reference implementation demonstrate, and how should — and shouldn't — it be used during estimation?

Kibble & Co. is a fictional demo merchant. This package is an independent demonstration by Nino Chavez of a scoping method — not a BigCommerce product, and not a real procurement.